Drawing for BISHOP

USPTO serial 79064629

BISHOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3795833Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 1, 2010
Examiner
ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BISHOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Gerien

J. Scott Gerien DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY1500 First Street, Ste 200Napa, CA 94559UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 4, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 4, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 4, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 20, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2010FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 2, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 1, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 22, 2010TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Apr 22, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 22, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 29, 2010RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 7, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 6, 2010OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2010OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Sep 15, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 13, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance