Drawing for BAGSAC

USPTO serial 79064756

BAGSAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAGSAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Bags and suitcasesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 25, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 20, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 20, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 14, 2017RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jun 26, 2014RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 22, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 30, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 27, 2009RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 3, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 28, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance