USPTO serial 79064824
HUMAN OPERATING SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HUMAN OPERATING SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus and instruments; scientific equipment; laboratory apparatus and instruments; machines for scientific and laboratory use; devices for scientific and laboratory use; chips arrays and sensors using DNA, genetic and other biological and diagnostic materials; headgear adapted for use in the reception of auditory and visual stimuli; simulators; holograms; artificial intelligence apparatus; operating systems; operating systems for personal robots; computers; computer hardware; computer peripherals; computer accessories and parts; apparatus for recording, transmission, or reproduction of images and data; data carriers and discs; computer operating systems; computer programs; computer software; computer games programs and software; video game programs; televisions; visual display screens and units; telephones and mobile phones; portable media players; personal digital assistants; cinematographic films; electronic publications; training apparatus; audio and video recordings; training guides in electronic format and in the form of a computer programs; cases and carrying cases for all of the aforesaid goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments; scientific apparatus for medical use and medical diagnosis; scientific apparatus for laboratory use and laboratory purposes; scientific electrical apparatus for medical diagnosis and medical treatment purposes; implants; implants for use in human medicine; implants for use in the body; artificial implants; artificial skin, eyes and limbs; artificial parts for the body; prostheses; medical prostheses; prosthetic implants; medical implants; surgical implants; prosthetic devices; surgical and medical devices; machines for medical and surgical use; electrical appliances for medical and surgical purposes; electrical machines for use in treating the human body; nerve, muscle and body stimulators; medical stimulators; apparatus for analysing brain wave frequencies | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Medical and healthcare services; medical and healthcare clinics; alternative medical and healthcare services; medical and health services relating to DNA, genetics and genetic testing; medical and health services relating to human enhancement; chiropractic, physiotherapy, acupuncture, osteopathy, sports medicine, massage and paramedical services; medical and surgical diagnostic services; surgical treatment services; pathology services; pharmacists services to make up prescriptions; psychological and lifestyle counselling; medical counselling; genetic counselling; fitting of artificial limbs, prosthetic devices and prostheses; cosmetic and plastic surgery; hygienic and beauty care for human beings | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2020 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 12, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |