Drawing for BFC

USPTO serial 79064842

BFC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3757743Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 9, 2010
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BFC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Max Vern

Max Vern Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Metal parts for vehicles, namely, automotive exterior and interior metal decorative, reinforcement and protective trim for vehicle windows, hoods, and trunk openingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2023ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Mar 3, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 9, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 26, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 26, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 24, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 29, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 9, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 22, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 2, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 8, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 8, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 6, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance