USPTO serial 79064842
BFC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 2010
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with BFC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bietigheim-Bissingen, DE
BFC Büro- und Fahrzeugtechnik GmbH & Co. Prod. KG
74321 Bietigheim-Bissingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by BFC Büro- und Fahrzeugtechnik GmbH & Co. Prod. KG
BFC Büro- und Fahrzeugtechnik GmbH & Co. Prod. KG
74321 Bietigheim-Bissingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by BFC Büro- und Fahrzeugtechnik GmbH & Co. Prod. KG
BFC Büro- und Fahrzeugtechnik GmbH & Co. Prod. KG
74321 Bietigheim-Bissingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by BFC Büro- und Fahrzeugtechnik GmbH & Co. Prod. KG
BFC; Büro- und Fahrzeugtechnik; GmbH & Co. Prod. KG
71686 Remseck (Aldingen), DE
Other trademarks owned by BFC; Büro- und Fahrzeugtechnik; GmbH & Co. Prod. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Vern
Max Vern Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Metal parts for vehicles, namely, automotive exterior and interior metal decorative, reinforcement and protective trim for vehicle windows, hoods, and trunk openings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BFC Fahrzeugteile GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by BFC Büro- und Fahrzeugtechnik GmbH & Co. Prod. KG
- Other trademarks owned by BFC Büro- und Fahrzeugtechnik GmbH & Co. Prod. KG
- Other trademarks owned by BFC Büro- und Fahrzeugtechnik GmbH & Co. Prod. KG
- Other trademarks owned by BFC; Büro- und Fahrzeugtechnik; GmbH & Co. Prod. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named BFC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |