Drawing for MICRODUR

USPTO serial 79064919

MICRODUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3715502Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 24, 2009
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICRODUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam Siegartel

Adam Siegartel Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700Dallas, TX 75219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Unwrought and semi-wrought common metals, in particular steel, stainless steel and bright steel; semi-finished products of steel in the form of rods, plates, sheets, billets, blocks, wire profiles, rings; auxiliary welding materials of metal, namely, metal welding rods, welding wireSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2025Further Decision Processed by IB—
Feb 25, 2025XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2025INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2025XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 16, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 7, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 1, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 1, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 1, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 16, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 17, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 25, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2009CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 3, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 27, 2009RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 5, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 4, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance