USPTO serial 79064973
WINTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WINTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Special machines, in particular winding machines for the reeling of web-like materials such as paper, films, nonwovens, coated webs, adhesive-coated films and paper, hygiene films and HD materials as well as labels; special machines on production lines for in-line or off-line winding methods; special machines for use as slitters or rewinders, that is for slitting or for bending products; contact winders; central and gap winders; reversing winders; orbital winders; hydraulic winders; winding shaft and roll handling systems; winding shafts; winding installations for film refining and film coating; unrolling installations with automatic splice system, including overlapping, for narrow webs in the hygiene sector and also for wide webs, for example, for bi or tri-laminates; unwinders and splicers for nowoven composites, for film composites, for paper processing, for synthetic leather and for composite materials; accessories in the form of machine parts for the aforesaid installations and machines if included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of the following machines and installations: special machines, in particular winding machines for the reeling of web-like materials such as paper, films, nonwovens, coated webs, adhesive-coated films and paper, hygiene films and HD materials as well as labels; special machines on production lines for in-line or off-line winding methods; special machines for use as slitters or rewinders, that is for slitting or for bending products; contact winders; central and gap winders; reversing winders; orbital winders; hydraulic winders; winding shaft and roll handling systems; winding shafts; winding installations for film refining and film coating; unrolling installations with auto including overlapping, for narrow webs in the hygiene sector and also for wide webs, for example, for bi or tri-laminates; unwinders and splicers for nonwoven composites, for film composites, for paper processing, for synthetic leather and for composite materials; accessories in the form of machine parts for the aforesaid installations and machines if included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |