Drawing for HYDROMAX

USPTO serial 79064987

HYDROMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3722622Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 8, 2009
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with HYDROMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Sommers

Mark Sommers Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP901 New York Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018[ Leather sold in bulk ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025FootwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2020INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 23, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 23, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 15, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 1, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 8, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 23, 2016INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 21, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2015C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 21, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 23, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 7, 2010FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 9, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 22, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 14, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 2, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance