USPTO serial 79065055
S.TEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3787569Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2010
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with S.TEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. Anderson
Lisa M. Anderson IDEX Corporation1925 West Field CourtSuite 200Lake Forest, IL 60045Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Hydraulic and pneumatic lifting apparatus, namely, jacks, lifts and hydraulic and pneumatic lifting cushions; electrical, pneumatic, hydraulic lifting apparatus, namely, jacks, lifts, and hydraulic and pneumatic lifting cushions; inflatable cushions for lifting sunken equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Slide and jumping sheet for rescue of persons; inflatable safety cushions for rescue of persons ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | [ Sealing and packaging material, namely, inflatable cushions for shutting off ducts, inflatable bandages and cushions for sealing leaks ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vetter GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Vetter GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Vetter GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named S.TEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | ISPO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |