Drawing for BIOCOOL

USPTO serial 79065540

BIOCOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3725817Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 15, 2009
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOCOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C Bruce Hamburg

C Bruce Hamburg Norris McLaughlin, P.A.7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Pumps as part of machines for dispensing beer beverages ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Refrigerators and freezers; air conditioning installations; wine coolers, namely, air-conditioned cabinets containing racks for wine bottles and storage shelvesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Containers for household or kitchen use not made of precious metals; cups and mugs not of precious metal; insulating bottles; non-electric portable coolers and non-electric refrigerating articles for bottles for domestic use, namely, portable beverage coolers in the form of portable cold boxes, bottle coolers and cool bags; bottle openers, corkscrewsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 18, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 6, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 12, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 20, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 14, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 22, 2016INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 2, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 11, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2016C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 1, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 12, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 16, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 29, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 9, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 20, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance