Drawing for SWINGLINE

USPTO serial 79065541

SWINGLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWINGLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Counter installations, namely machines for pumping beverages, in particular beer pumpsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Cooling and freezing apparatus; air-conditioning installations; air-conditioned wine cabinetsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
021Household or kitchen containers (not of precious metal); cups and mugs not of precious metal; insulating bottles; non-electric portable coolers and refrigerating articles for bottles (non-electric) for domestic use; bottle openers, corkscrewsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 14, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 12, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 21, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 12, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 10, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 20, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance