USPTO serial 79065629
WFL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3744891Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 2, 2010
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with WFL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WFL Millturn Technologies; GmbH & Co.KG
A-4030 Linz, AT
Other trademarks owned by WFL Millturn Technologies; GmbH & Co.KG
WFL Millturn Technologies; GmbH & Co.KG
A-4030 Linz, AT
Other trademarks owned by WFL Millturn Technologies; GmbH & Co.KG
WFL Millturn Technologies; GmbH & Co.KG
Linz, AT
Other trademarks owned by WFL Millturn Technologies; GmbH & Co.KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melanie I. Rauch
Melanie I. Rauch Setter Roche Smith & Shellenberger LLP1860 Blake StreetSuite 500Denver, CO 80202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools for cutting and forming of materials; milling, turning, and drilling machine and centres and parts thereof; grinding machines; milling-drilling machines; lathe centres; milling cutters { machine tool }; metalworking machine tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for the operation and the functioning of machine tools; scientific and technological services and research related to treatment of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WFL Millturn Technologies; GmbH & Co.KG
- Other trademarks owned by WFL Millturn Technologies; GmbH & Co.KG
- Other trademarks owned by WFL Millturn Technologies; GmbH & Co.KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WFL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 2, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2009 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |