USPTO serial 79065663
ARGUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3744894Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 2, 2010
- Examiner
- PEETE, KYLE C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARGUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
BE
Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
BE
Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
BE
Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Bagarazzi
James m. Bagarazzi DORITY & MANNING, P.A.P.O. Box 1449Greenville, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Sorting machines for various bulk goods; sorting machines using laser beams; sorting machines for processing foodstuffs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Sorting apparatus using laser beams for sorting money; laser scanners for sorting purposes; computer programs for the control of machines for the industrial processing of foodstuffs; cameras (including CCD cameras) used in the sorting of goods; industrial X-ray apparatus for the sorting of goods, other than for medical purposes; lenses, lens diaphragms, optical mirrors, optical sensors and fiber optics used in money sorting apparatus; lasers, not for medical purposes, laser diodes, solid state lasers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Sorting of bulk goods, including foodstuffs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological consulting and research and design services, relating to the development of apparatus for the sorting of goods; design and development of computers, electronics and software for use in sorting apparatus | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ARGUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 16, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 2, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |