USPTO serial 79065733
QUALITY MADE IN GERMANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUALITY MADE IN GERMANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thilo C. Agthe
Thilo C. Agthe Wuersch & Gering LLP100 Wall Street, 21st FloorNew York, NY 10005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Ironmongery and small items of metal hardware, namely, pulleys, springs, nuts, washers, thimbles; goods of common metal, namely, beams of metal, bolts of metal, casings of metal; roof drainage devices of metal, in particular of steel, stainless steel, copper, zinc or aluminum, namely gutters, down pipes, downspouts, metallic drain traps, eaves gutters, drainpipes, water collecting basins in the nature of metal in-ground sewage and water run-off basins; accessories for roof drainage devices, namely union clips in the nature of metal pipe clips, elbows of metal for pipes, end-connection pieces in the nature of metal pipe connectors, metal down spouts, brace arms, collection clamps, metal expanding sleeves for affixing screws, metal pipe clips, metal pipes with and without fitted dirt pans and rodding eyes, structural parts of metal gutters in the nature of metal gutter strainers, attachable rainwater pipe heads, metal pipe couplings, metal hanging pipe connectors, metal drain pipes in the nature of metal angle pipes for drainpipes, gutter bends in the nature of elbows of metal for pipes, metal stand pipe covers, metal rainwater valves not being parts of machines and structural parts for the aforesaid goods and devices; all the aforesaid goods of metal, in particular of steel, stainless steel, copper, zinc or aluminum | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Roof drainage devices of plastic, namely gutters, downspouts, plastic conduit for drainage, eaves gutters, drainpipes, water-collecting basins in the nature of plastic in-ground sewage and water run-off basins; accessories of plastic for roof drainage devices, namely plastic union clips , plastic elbows, plastic end caps for use on drainpipes lower end , non-metal down spouts, rafter arms in the nature of building materials, namely, plastic pipe supports, non-metal rigid pipes with and without fitted dirt pans and rodding eyes, structural parts of non-metal gutters in the nature of non-metal gutter strainers, attachable rainwater heads for gutters of plastic, couplings of plastic, slip joint connectors of plastic, angled drain pipes made of concrete, earthenware or sandstone, non metal gutter elbows, non-metal stand pipe covers, non metal rainwater pipes and structural parts for the aforesaid goods and devices; mounting guide templates of plastic for mounting drainpipes and drainages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Industrial research in the field of drainage devices; scientific research in the fields of engineering, hydrology, meteorology and physics; product research and development for others | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 8, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |