USPTO serial 79065781
NANOPURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3686339Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 2009
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with NANOPURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Helen Hill Minsker
HELEN HILL MINSKER BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.71 S WACKER DR, SUITE 3600CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NITTA HAAS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by NITTA HAAS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by NITTA DuPont Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named NANOPURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |