Drawing for PLANUS

USPTO serial 79065828

PLANUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3835187Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 17, 2010
Examiner
PEETE, KYLE C
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PLANUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric pumps and accessories therefor; [ compressed air pumps; vacuum pumps; ] submerged pumps; sanitary wares pumps for toilets; macerator pumps; water pumps for toilets [; garbage disposal unit; unit for desalination and reduction of salt levels in water; ventilation fans ]ACTIVE—
011Pipes for plumbing being part of sanitary facilities; plumbing fittings, namely, valves; toilet bowls; bidets; wash basins; [ sinks; wash tubs; urinals; bathtubs; whirlpool bathtubs; shower trays; ] sanitary taps; mixer faucets for water pipes [; hot water tanks; showers; shower enclosures; sauna cabins; refrigerators ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 23, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 18, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 18, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 17, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 2, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Mar 2, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 2, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 16, 2015715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Dec 16, 2015MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 7, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 13, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 17, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 1, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 27, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 12, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 29, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 24, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 24, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance