USPTO serial 79065906
CHIPLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3903091Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2011
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHIPLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools for the electric, electronics and plastics industries, namely, adhesive tape dispensing machines, automatic stamping machines, cutting machines, electric welding machines, embossing, machines and semiconductor manufacturing machines, except household and kitchen appliances; shaping machines, namely, punching and bending machines for metalworking, mechanical tools for punching and bending machines, namely, belts, brakes, clutches, compressors, motors, filters, cylinders, blades, valves, wheels, machines for the packaging of integrated circuits, handling and assembly machines for use in the electronic industry for the processing of micro-parts and for micro-bonding, fine-wire winding machines, in particular for manufacturing electric coils and for connecting electronic components to coils | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; blank magnetic data carriers, recording discs; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers; fire-extinguishing apparatus; electric and electronic components for computers; signal processors; computer peripheral devices; blank optical and magneto-optical data carriers; transponder cards; readers for transponder cards; programmable radio identification devices (RFID), namely, RFID readers, RFID credentials, namely, cards and tags, and readers for radio frequency identification credentials; transponders in the form of programmed devices for implanting under the skin for identifying animals; transponders in the form of attachable signboards (tags) for identifying trees, telegraph poles and similar objects, and for use in the art sector to identify works of arts, copies of the original and restored works of art; transponders in the form of contact and non-contact paper labels (tags) for use in the management of supply chains, in production supervision, luggage identification, for express parcel services and goods transport services, for use in preventing forgeries and the identification of works of art; transponders in the form of adhesive labels (tags) for identifying industrial gas cylinders; encoding apparatus and reading apparatus, computer monitors and computer screens for all the aforesaid goods, software applications, namely, pre-recorded computer software for use in the field of radio frequency identification for operating the aforesaid goods; radio frequency identification (RFID) credentials, namely, cards and tags, and readers for radio frequency identification credentials, for use as electronic passports and security documents, encoded electronic chip cards for identifying persons, objects or animals containing programming for security and identification purposes, encoded integrated circuit cards for identifying persons, objects or animals containing programming for security and identification purposes, encoded smart cards for identifying persons, objects or animals containing programming for security and identification purposes, magnetic cards and microchip cards; electronic labels containing programming for the processing, transmission and reception of data; electronic payment devices, namely, electronic and magnetic id cards for use in connection with payment for goods and services, and electronic payment terminals; electric components and assemblies, namely, electronic sensor for image processing, electronic control device for image processing consisting of sensors, processors, actuators for image processing | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | plastics in extruded form for use in manufacture; packing, sealing and insulating materials; flexible pipes, not of metal; semi-processed plastics being substrates for electronic components; semi-processed plastics being substrates for transponders | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and industrial research in the field of radio frequency identification technology; computer programming; non-business industrial consultancy, namely, technical and specialist consultancy with regard to computer hardware and software; electrical and electronic engineering; programming services and development and installation of customer-specific computer software applications, and for operating programmable radio frequency identification apparatus | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Smartrac Investment B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Smartrac IP B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Smartrac IP B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Smartrac IP B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CHIPLINK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 19, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |