Drawing for BLUE COAT

USPTO serial 79065988

BLUE COAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3767604Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 30, 2010
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUE COAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia Smink Rogowski

Patricia Smink Rogowski Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP2005 Market Street, Suite 2200Philadelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Brushes and brush elements being parts of machines, *, namely, * [ in particular ] being roller sweepers, side brooms, circular brooms, brush rollers, brush rings, bristle bundles for [ lawn and sports ground maintenance, road, pavement, ] landing strip and runway cleaning at airports, [ snow clearing, ] industrial cleaning [ and floor cleaning, and for use ] in the concrete industry and in clarifying installations; brushes and brush elements being parts of machines for car washing installations, for cleaning marker posts and for weed removal * at railway tracks * [; electric and motorized cleaning machines and apparatus, namely, street sweeping machines and floor cleaning apparatus in the nature of machines, and spare structural parts and wearing structural parts therefor ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021[ Brooms, brushes, brush goods, cleaning brushes of all kinds, namely, non-electric sweeping brushes for industrial use for cleaning buildings and paved surfaces, and for floor cleaning; brooms, brushes, brush goods, cleaning brushes of all kinds, namely, non-electric roller sweepers in the nature of brushes for industrial use for cleaning buildings and paved surfaces, and for floor cleaning; brooms, brushes, brush goods, cleaning brushes of all kinds, namely, non-electric rotary brushes for industrial use for cleaning buildings and paved surfaces, and for floor cleaning; brooms, brushes, brush goods, cleaning brushes of all kinds, namely, circular brooms, disc brooms, brushes for washing signposts, side brooms, floor cleaning pads, scrubbing brushes, shoe brushes, dishwashing brushes, horse and animal brushes, and cattle cleaning brushes; components and accessories for all the aforesaid goods, namely, synthetic and metallic brush bristles and brush bristle bundles; hand-operated cleaning machines, namely, non-electric carpet sweeping machines and non-electric floor cleaning apparatus in the nature of brushes, and spare structural parts and wearing structural parts therefor ]SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 14, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 11, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 4, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 11, 2016ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Nov 4, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 13, 2015INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 10, 2014INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
May 29, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
May 29, 2014LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
May 29, 2014COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
May 22, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 22, 2014LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 12, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 12, 2013LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2013COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Mar 12, 2013PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Feb 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 19, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 30, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 12, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 4, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 9, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 9, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance