Drawing for GRIMME

USPTO serial 79066015

GRIMME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRIMME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Raking machines; rammers; grinding machines; rammers (machines); jacks (machines); compressors (machines); agricultural machines; diggers (machines); spraying machines; stalk separators (machines); filling machines; driving motors, other than for land vehicles; grain separators; belt conveyors; metal drawing machines; threshing machines; earth moving machines; braiding machines; materials handling machines; grating machines for vegetables; reapers; corn husking machines; winnowers; flour mills; chaff cutter blades; tedding machines; agricultural implements; combine harvesters; machines for agricultural purposes; mixing machines; rakes for raking machines; root slicers (machines); seeders; cutting machines; sifters; weeding machines; tools (parts of machines); waste compacting machines; straw (chaff) cuttersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Watering machines for agricultural purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Driving motors for land vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Retail services in respect of raking machines, rammers, shredders (machines), rammers (machines), jacks (machines); compressors (machines), agriculture machines, diggers (machines), spraying machines, stalk separators (machines), filling machines, driving motors and engines other than for land vehicles, grain separators, belt conveyors, metal drawing machines, threshers, soil moving machinery, braiding machines, conveyors (machines), grating machines for vegetables, reapers, corn husking machines, winnowers, flour mills, chaff cutter blades, tedding machines, agricultural implements other than hand-operated, combines, machines for agricultural purposes, mixing machines, rakes for raking machines, root slicers (machines), sowers (machines), cutting machines, sifting machines, weeding machines, tools (machine parts), trash and waste compacting machines, straw (chaff) cutters, watering machines for agricultural purposes, driving motors for land vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Machinery installation, maintenance and repair; reconditioning of machines that are worn or partially destroyed; irrigation devices installation and repairSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 14, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 29, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 26, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 16, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 1, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 10, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance