Drawing for GO LIVE

USPTO serial 79066064

GO LIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GO LIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Broadcasting; communications and telecommunications; transmission, broadcast, reception and other dissemination of audio, video, still and moving images, text and data whether in real or delayed time; electronic mail services; teletext and interactive broadcasting services; data, video and live program streaming services; video conferencing servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Provision of entertainment, education, recreation, instruction, tuition and training; production, presentation and distribution of audio, video, still and moving images and data; publishing services (including electronic publishing services); the provision of discussion forums; non-downloadable electronic publications; organisation, production and presentation of shows, competitions, games, concerts, exhibitions and events; language teaching; provision of information and advisory services relating to any of the aforesaid servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 26, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 14, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 26, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 2, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 17, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 16, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 8, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance