USPTO serial 79066112
ILSE JACOBSEN HORNBAEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3864319Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 2010
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ILSE JACOBSEN HORNBAEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle P. Ciotola
Michelle P. Ciotola CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH STREETFLOOR 22HARTFORD, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, women's belts and rainwear for ladies[ and gentlemen]; footwear, namely, ladies' shoes, ladies' sandals, ladies' boots, rubber boots for ladies[, children and men]; headgear, namely, hats and caps | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ilse JACOBSEN
- Other trademarks owned by IJH A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Ilse JACOBSEN
- Other trademarks owned by Ilse JACOBSEN
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ILSE JACOBSEN HORNBAEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2026 | NC71 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 71 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 25, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |