Drawing for ESENCIA

USPTO serial 79066166

ESENCIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESENCIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Food flavouringSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 25, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 24, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 25, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 27, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 2, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 9, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 5, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 5, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 7, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 7, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 7, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance