USPTO serial 79066226
OTICON CONNECTLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3737185Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 12, 2010
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with OTICON CONNECTLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Brett Heavner
B. Brett Heavner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP901 New York Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Communication devices for use with hearing aids, namely , wireless transmitters and receivers for interconnecting hearing aids to other electronic communication devices, such as wireless telephones, radio or television receivers, music playing apparatus and computers; hearing aid accessories, namely, remote controllers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 8, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |