Drawing for ECOPAC

USPTO serial 79066250

ECOPAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3847943Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 14, 2010
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOPAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryan M. Gallo

Bryan M. Gallo Pearne & Gordon LLP1801 East 9th StreetSuite 1200Cleveland, OH 44114-3108

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Plastic processing machines, namely, injection plastic molding machines, extrusion plants consisting primarily of extruder, die, calibration unit, adapted cooling unit, haul-off unit, and cut-to-length unit, extruders, namely, extrusion machines for plastic and rubber and extruder screws, reaction injection molding machines, in particular for processing polyurethane, and structural and replacement parts thereof as well as successive appliances, namely, machine tools, namely, molds for use in the manufacture of injection molded articles and dies for use in the manufacture of extruded articles, plastic forming machines, mixing machines, metering machines, mixing machine parts, namely, mixing heads ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009[ Electrical and electronic control apparatus for plastic processing machines, namely, testers, calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers, electrical energy utilization metering devices complete with related software, electronic devices, namely, energy meters for tracking and monitoring energy usage for injection molding machines, extrusion plants, extruders, reaction injection molding machines; measuring, signal and control apparatus for plastic processing machines, namely, testing and measuring equipment for use in testing the performance and efficiency of power plant equipment; computer software for controlling plastic processing machines ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
017Insulation equipment for plastic processing machines, namely, insulation equipment for cylinders and parts thereof and insulation for dies for pipes, namely, insulating sleeves for insulating heated parts of plastic processing machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 8, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 27, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 22, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 29, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 8, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Apr 7, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Nov 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 14, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 5, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Nov 2, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 14, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 14, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 14, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
May 28, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 28, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Sep 28, 2016C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Sep 27, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 26, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Sep 14, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 12, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 23, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 10, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 7, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 7, 2011CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Dec 14, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 14, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 29, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 17, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 16, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 21, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
May 22, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 21, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 21, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 21, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 2, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance