USPTO serial 79066250
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
KraussMaffei Technologies GmbH
DE
KraussMaffei Technologies GmbH
Muenchen, DE
KraussMaffei Technologies GmbH
Muenchen, DE
KraussMaffei Technologies GmbH
Muenchen, DE
KraussMaffei Technologies GmbH
DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan M. Gallo
Bryan M. Gallo Pearne & Gordon LLP1801 East 9th StreetSuite 1200Cleveland, OH 44114-3108| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Plastic processing machines, namely, injection plastic molding machines, extrusion plants consisting primarily of extruder, die, calibration unit, adapted cooling unit, haul-off unit, and cut-to-length unit, extruders, namely, extrusion machines for plastic and rubber and extruder screws, reaction injection molding machines, in particular for processing polyurethane, and structural and replacement parts thereof as well as successive appliances, namely, machine tools, namely, molds for use in the manufacture of injection molded articles and dies for use in the manufacture of extruded articles, plastic forming machines, mixing machines, metering machines, mixing machine parts, namely, mixing heads ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [ Electrical and electronic control apparatus for plastic processing machines, namely, testers, calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers, electrical energy utilization metering devices complete with related software, electronic devices, namely, energy meters for tracking and monitoring energy usage for injection molding machines, extrusion plants, extruders, reaction injection molding machines; measuring, signal and control apparatus for plastic processing machines, namely, testing and measuring equipment for use in testing the performance and efficiency of power plant equipment; computer software for controlling plastic processing machines ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Insulation equipment for plastic processing machines, namely, insulation equipment for cylinders and parts thereof and insulation for dies for pipes, namely, insulating sleeves for insulating heated parts of plastic processing machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 28, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 22, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |