Drawing for PRECI-DIP

USPTO serial 79066309

PRECI-DIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3763382Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 23, 2010
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PRECI-DIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Mango

Thomas J. Mango Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Machine tools with respect to contact and connector technology, namely, equipment for use in crimping, cutting, press-fit, and contact assembly ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Connection elements for electrical and electronic equipment, namely electric contacts, spring loaded electric contacts, miniature electric connectors, board to board connectors being connectors for electric circuits, application specific electric connectors, sockets for integrated circuitsACTIVE—
042Engineering, research and development for third parties in the field of contact and connector technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2021INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 5, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 5, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 30, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 20, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 27, 2018CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Apr 18, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 29, 2017EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jun 9, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 1, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 5, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 5, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 5, 2016C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 5, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 23, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 23, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 18, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 16, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance