USPTO serial 79066317
THE MUNICH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE MUNICH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
MARK B HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising; business management services; business administration; office functions | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Insurance and reinsurance agencies; insurance underwriting services for all types of insurance; reinsurance underwriting; insurance and reinsurance consultancy; insurance and reinsurance information; insurance and reinsurance subrogation; insurance and reinsurance brokerage; insurance and reinsurance actuarial services; insurance and reinsurance administration; insurance and reinsurance claims processing; consultation in the fields of insurance, reinsurance, insurance underwriting and reinsurance underwriting; consultation services in the fields of property insurance, casualty insurance, reinsurance, legal expenses insurance, liability insurance, life insurance, fire insurance, accident insurance, and health insurance as well as in the field of administration of insurance and reinsurance claims; financial affairs, namely, financial information, management and analysis services; financial advice; financial consultation; financial forecasting; financing services; financial research; consultation in the field of financial risk management; financial services, namely, consultation in finance management and planning; monetary exchange; acquisition and transfer of monetary claims; monetary strategy consultation and research; real estate consultation; real estate agencies; real estate appraisal; real estate brokerage; real estate listing; real estate financing services; real estate investment services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Medical and veterinary services; hygienic and beauty care for human beings; agricultural advice; forest habitat restoration | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 6, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |