USPTO serial 79066340
EMERALD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, ERIN
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMERALD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry, game, meat extracts, broth, bouillon, shellfish, namely shrimp, lobster, clams, processed meat, frozen meat, dried meat, fried meat, meat jellies, meat juices, canned, dried, preserved or processed fruits and vegetables namely peaches, apricots, beans, instant or pre-cooked soups, processed olives, pickles, raisins, prepared walnuts, olive oil, sunflower oil, sesame oil, milk and milk products, namely milk, cheese, yoghurt, ayran (drink based on yoghurt), cream, milk powder, milk based beverages containing fruits, edible oils and fats, butter, margarine, frozen, prepared or packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables, tomato paste, preserved or processed chickpeas, lentil, soy beans, ground almonds, jams, marmalades, fruit jellies, unflavored and unsweetened gelatins; processed and roasted nuts, proteins for use as food additives, eggs, powdered eggs; processed bee pollen for food purposes, potato chips, potato crisps, potato fritters | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |