Drawing for KKIMAC

USPTO serial 79066408

KKIMAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3867521Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 26, 2010
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KKIMAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa S. Dillenbeck

Melissa S. Dillenbeck Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP191 North Wacker DriveSuite 3700Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[Cameras; optical condensers; image processors, not for medical purposes; optical lenses;] light dimmers, electric; lighting ballasts; apparatus for regulating electric power supply for lighting; electronic apparatus for the remote control of industrial operations[ ; computer peripheral devices; computer operating programs ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010[LED lamps, for medical diagnosis and operation; medical image processors; orthopaedic footwear; radiotherapy apparatus]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011[Electric lamps; flares;] LED lamps, not for medical purposes[; ultraviolet ray lamps, not for medical purposes]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 6, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 7, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 7, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 26, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 18, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 29, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 9, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 9, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2017C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 9, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 27, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 29, 2013INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2012INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 8, 2011COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jun 8, 2011PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jun 8, 2011LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
May 27, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 7, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 26, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 18, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2010ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 2, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2010LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
May 14, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 22, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 9, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance