Drawing for BCM

USPTO serial 79066422

BCM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3734466Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 5, 2010
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BCM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John H. Weber

John H. Weber Baker & Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue N.W.Washington Square, Suite 1100Washington, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Construction industry machines and machine tools and structural parts therefore for use in traffic area construction, airfield construction, railway construction, embankment dam construction, landfill construction, pipeline and channel construction, asphalt construction, earth-moving, hydraulic engineering, construction of tips, and mining and road demolition, namely, machines and machine tools and structural parts therefor for use in road repair, namely, crushers, road millers, road surface breakers, road finishers, asphalt finishers pavers, road topping recyclers, ground stabilizers, binding agent and grit spreaders; ] compactors and structural parts therefor for use with soil, asphalt and waste, namely, rollers [, tampers, and vibrating plates; machines, equipment and structural parts therefore for use in horizontal and vertical conveying of construction materials, namely, conveyor belts, slide conveyors, hoists and hydraulic lift tables ]ACTIVE—
009Computer programs and software for documentation of soil compaction in the field of construction; computer programs to measure and control machines for soil compaction in the field of construction; devices for documentation of soil compaction in the field of the construction industry, namely, electronic instruments for measuring soil height and compactionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 12, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 8, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 8, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 8, 2020PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
Dec 23, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 28, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 28, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 14, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 5, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 20, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 16, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 7, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 6, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 5, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 4, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance