USPTO serial 79066451
TOKYO KEISU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3807154Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2010
- Examiner
- KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TOKYO KEISU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electromagnetic counters; measuring or testing machines and instruments, namely, gasometers, thermometers, water meters, balances, and tape measures; electric or magnetic meters and testers, namely, voltage, amperage, telephone line, and continuity testers; coin counting or sorting machines; electric sign boards for displaying target figures, current outputs and the like electronic data; photocopying machines; vending machines; apparatus in the nature of a home video game console used with Arcade games and external display screens and monitors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Contex Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Contex Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Contex Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Tokyo Keisu Industry Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TOKYO KEISU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 1, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |