Drawing for SMARTLIPO

USPTO serial 79066479

SMARTLIPO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3728681Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 22, 2009
Examiner
MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTLIPO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CECELIA M. PERRY

CECELIA M. PERRY MCGLEW AND TUTTLE, P.C.SCARBOROUGH STATIONSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-9227UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical equipment also using a laser for liquefying and removing body fat and for anti-cellulite and anti-perspiration treatment and with a firming effect; medical equipment using a laser for anti-cellulite, anti-perspiration and firming treatmentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044[ Medical services for liquefying and removing body fat and for anti-cellulite and anti-perspiration treatments having a firming effect ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 2, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 20, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 27, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 21, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 21, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 201671.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 21, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 21, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2010FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 15, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 23, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 16, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 23, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 10, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance