Drawing for ORIGANIC

USPTO serial 79066493

ORIGANIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3763385Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 23, 2010
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORIGANIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Max Vern

Max Vern Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP90 Park AvenueNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Preparations for personal and beauty care, namely, skin cleansing lotions, skin cleansing gels, facial creams, facial lotions, body lotions; anti-aging facial care products, namely, facial creams and facial lotions; treatment kit which can reduce the effect of wrinkles, comprised of facial creams and facial lotions; moisturizing creams; wellness products, namely, facial lotions, body lotions and moisturizing creams; massage creams, body soaps, perfumes and essential oils for personal use, hair lotions, and toothpastesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 23, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 28, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 30, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 28, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 28, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 30, 2010FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 23, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 13, 2010CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 16, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 27, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 16, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 15, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 15, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance