USPTO serial 79066581
ALIENVAULT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2010
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ALIENVAULT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Open Source Security Information; Management S.L.
ES
Other trademarks owned by Open Source Security Information; Management S.L.
US
San Mateo, CA, US
Open Source Security Information; Management S.L.
ES
Other trademarks owned by Open Source Security Information; Management S.L.
Open Source Security Information; Management S.L.
ES
Other trademarks owned by Open Source Security Information; Management S.L.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet J. Lee
Janet J. Lee Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.71 South Wacker DriveSuite 3600Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for computer security; computer hardware containing computer security software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer systems analysis for the installation of computer systems in the field of computer security; design of computer networks for others in the field of computer security; design and development of computer software, for others, in the field of computer security; computer consultancy in the field of computer security; computer programming for others in the field of computer security; design of computer software in the field of computer security; installation of computer software in the field of computer security; rental of computer software in the field of computer security; maintenance of computer software in the field of computer security; updating of computer software for others in the field of computer security; duplication of computer programs in the field of computer security; conversion of computer program data or information in the field of computer security; recovery of computer data in the field of computer security; creating and maintaining web sites for others in the field of computer security; hosting others' web sites on a computer server for a global computer network in the field of computer security; technical consulting, namely, technical project studies in the field of computer security; data processing using computers in connection with computer security; operation and maintenance of software in computer systems in relation to computer security | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Granting of computer software licenses relating to computer security | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Open Source Security Information; Management S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by AlienVault, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AlienVault, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Open Source Security Information; Management S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by Open Source Security Information; Management S.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named ALIENVAULT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 9, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| May 9, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |