Drawing for DUSTAWAY BY AIRTEC

USPTO serial 79066716

DUSTAWAY BY AIRTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3705626Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 3, 2009
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DUSTAWAY BY AIRTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kornelia Wayda

Kornelia Wayda euromaier AGSchmidbergstrasse 23Wattwil, 9630SWITZERLAND

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for the abrasive treatment of surfaces, namely, chipping hammers, milling machines and cleaning machines for floors and walls, sand-blasting machines, mechanically operated hand-held tools by compressed air, with dust suction, functioning by means of petrol or diesel, electrical or hydraulic motors, for cleaning, abrading and leveling surfacesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 1, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 3, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 30, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 16, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 2, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 4, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 18, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 29, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 12, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 12, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance