Drawing for PRIMA

USPTO serial 79066775

PRIMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Projector lamps, electric candelabras, chandeliers, electric track lighting units, electric lighting fixtures, light diffusers, safety lamps for underground use, electric lamps, gas lamps, oil lamps, lamps for outdoor use, lanterns for lighting, lanterns, lamp reflectors, lamp shades, light bulbs, electric discharge tubes for lighting, lampshade holders, ceiling lights, sockets for electric lights, arc lamps, being lighting fixtures, electric lights for christmas trees, lighting tubes, fluorescent lamp tubes, electric chinese lanterns, soldering lamps, professional work lampsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 23, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 1, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 16, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 30, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 30, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 20, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance