USPTO serial 79066844
NUMERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3784939Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 4, 2010
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with NUMERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia K. Stephenson
Cynthia K. Stephenson Posz Law Group, PLC12040 South Lakes Drive, Suite 101Reston, VA 20191UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazines in the field of fashion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 16, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |