Drawing for VOIGT & SCHWEITZER

USPTO serial 79066868

VOIGT & SCHWEITZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOIGT & SCHWEITZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Coating of metal parts with paint for the purpose of protecting metal parts against corrosionSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
040Treatment of metal parts for the purpose of protecting metal parts against corrosion by hot-dip galvanizing and powder coatingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 9, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 27, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 11, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 16, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 23, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 24, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance