USPTO serial 79066892
URBACO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3818480Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 2010
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with URBACO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lebow
1727 King StreetSuite 105Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Non-luminous and non-mechanical metal bollards and posts for roads; fixed and removable metallic bollards and posts [ ; flower boxes of metal; baskets of metal; metal tree grilles, namely, metal gratings used to protect trees ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electric, automatic and semi-automatic retractable bollards and posts; mechanical retractable bollards and posts; luminous bollards and posts; command stations comprised of software and electric and mechanical controllers for controlling and managing retractable bollards and posts; systems comprised of software and electric and mechanical controllers to control access to pedestrian isles, reserved parking, historical town centers and restricted traffic areas; centralizing systems comprised of traffic lights for managing pedestrian and vehicular access to passages, namely, roadways and parking areas; fixed and retractable power and water dispensers sold together as a unit and used in the public and private sector, namely, machine units that connect to power sockets for the distribution of energy and water in temporary structures such as markets, exhibitions, and camps | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | [ Non-metallic, non-luminous and non-mechanical bollards and posts for roads; fixed and removable non-metallic bollards and posts; flower boxes of concrete and of stone; non-metallic tree grilles, namely, non-metallic gratings used to protect trees ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | [ Articles for urban decor included in this class, namely, benches ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | [ Articles for urban decor included in this class, namely, non-metallic waste paper baskets ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAME S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by CAME GROUP S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by CAME GROUP S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by CAME GROUP S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by FIN-MEN S.p.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named URBACO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 13, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |