Drawing for ARGISOL

USPTO serial 79066909

ARGISOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARGISOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. GREGORY SCHIVLEY

G. GREGORY SCHIVLEY HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC5445 CORPORATE DRSTE 200TROY, MI 48098-2683

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Insulating breeze blocksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
019Breeze blocksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 7, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 2, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 2, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 29, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 27, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 25, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 23, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 16, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 15, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 25, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 29, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance