Drawing for CHÂTEAU PAVIE

USPTO serial 79066989

CHÂTEAU PAVIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3845372Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 7, 2010
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CHÂTEAU PAVIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julianne Abelman

Julianne Abelman Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP950 3rd Avenue, Suite 2400New York, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines with certified label of origin (AOC wines)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 22, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 22, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 7, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 16, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 12, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 12, 201671AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Oct 12, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 6, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2011FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 7, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 22, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 30, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 17, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 4, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 1, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 30, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 24, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance