Drawing for FIBERBLADE

USPTO serial 79067061

FIBERBLADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3811002Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 29, 2010
Examiner
LOOK, JEFFREY J
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIBERBLADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NATHANIEL KRAMER

NATHANIEL KRAMER KIRSCHSTEIN ISRAEL SCHIFFMILLER ET. AL.425 FIFTH AVENUE 5TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016-2223UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine devices, namely, cutting tools, namely, cutting heads for laser cutting machines; machines and machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials; welding tools, namely, laser welding heads for laser welding machines; laser sources, namely, laser engraving machines; laser welding machines; markers, namely, laser marking machines; and machines for material processing by means of laser, particularly for cutting and marking work piecesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Electronic apparatus and instruments for controlling, monitoring and regulating purposes, namely, for use with machines for material processing by means of laser; and control devices composed of goods for machine devices, namely, electronic control systems for machines; industrial automation controls; remote controls for machines; and machines for material processing by means of laser in the nature of laser welding torches, laser measuring systems and protective covers for use with lasers for industrial use; lasers not for medical purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 12, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 27, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 5, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 3, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 29, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 29, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 21, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 10, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 29, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 29, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 29, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance