Drawing for LIV-EX

USPTO serial 79067098

LIV-EX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3896495Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 28, 2010
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with LIV-EX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Fishman

Michael D. Fishman Fishman Stewart PLLC800 Tower Drive, Suite 610Troy, MI 48098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Cost price analysis services; provision of information relating to wine prices; price comparison services; comparison of wine prices for others; price information services for others in the field of wines; computer assisted and web-based price information services, namely, providing an on-line computer database in the field of pricing wines; business information services; providing statistical information services; [ retail stores services in the field of wines; online retail store services in the field of wines; ] on-line trading services in which seller posts wines to be auctioned and bidding is done via the Internet; providing indexes of wine prices for others; provision of statistical information relating to the fine wine market; commercial information services, provided by access to a computer database in the field of fine wine prices and wine prices but not including information about wine-making and not providing information about wine characteristics; compilation and systemization of information into computer databases; provision of market reports; provision of fine wine market reports; business services, namely, providing an on-line searchable database featuring wine prices but not including information about wine-making and not providing information about wine characteristics; information, advisory and consultancy services, all relating to the aforesaid services, namely, price comparison services, provision of information relating to wine prices and retail store services and online retail store services in the field of winesACTIVE—
039Warehousing services, namely, storage of wines; transportation services, namely, the transportation of wines by air, road, rail and sea; wine transportation services by air, road, rail and sea; packaging of products, namely, packaging of wines and packaging articles for transportation; wine packaging services for transportation; information, advisory and consultancy services, all relating to the aforesaid services, namely, the storage and transportation of winesACTIVE—
042Hosting and operating a website for the exchange of fine wines from around the world for others; design and development of computer software; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer software applications for database management and for use as spreadsheet in the field of wines and fine wines through a website; information, advisory and consultancy services, all relating to the aforesaid services, namely, hosting and operating a website for the exchange of fine wines from around the world, the design and development of computer software and providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer software applications for database management and for use as spreadsheet in the field of wines and fine wines through a websiteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 2, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 9, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 9, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 9, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 2, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 21, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 1, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 17, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 17, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 17, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 23, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 28, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 12, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 23, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 10, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 10, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 10, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 29, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 6, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance