Drawing for MTS

USPTO serial 79067106

MTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3825232Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 27, 2010
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Upton Douglass

Susan Upton Douglass Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005dental mastics, namely, dental cements; conductive lacquer for dental purposes; porcelain for dental prosthesesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010Molds for the manufacture of dental saw-cut models, namely, model-tray base former in the nature of a molding tool used to take a dental impression and cast a dental model used to help design dental treatments by showing the arrangement of a subject's teeth in a dental arch and possible re-arrangements of a subject's teeth; impression base regulator in the nature of a molding tool for aligning and casting a dental model used to help design dental treatments by showing the arrangement of a subject's teeth in a dental arch and possible re-arrangements of a subject's teeth; model splitting apparatus in the nature of a tool for mounting or boxing a dental model used to help design dental treatments by showing the arrangement of a subject's teeth in a dental arch and possible re-arrangements of a subject's teeth; model duplicating apparatus in the nature of a tool for creating multiple sets of a dental model used to help design dental treatments by showing the arrangement of a subject's teeth in a dental arch and possible re-arrangements of a subject's teeth; dust suctioning apparatus in the nature of tubes and air filters for suctioning dust created by sawing dental material; CAD/CAM apparatus for viewing and adjusting the molds in the nature of three-dimensional computer modeling used to help design dental treatments by showing the arrangement of a subject's teeth in a dental arch and possible re-arrangements of a subject's teeth; sawing machines and parts for dental purposes, namely, diamond tools, milling cutters, polishers, root canal instruments, sintered carbide drills, surgical burrs, brushes for polishing motors and root pins; dental implantsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 5, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 1, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 3, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 3, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Mar 3, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 27, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 11, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 7, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 25, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 25, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 29, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 2, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance