USPTO serial 79067119
SILAROM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3803320Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2010
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SILAROM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Silesia Gerhard Hanke; GmbH & Co KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Silesia Gerhard Hanke; GmbH & Co KG
Silesia Gerhard Hanke; GmbH & Co KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Silesia Gerhard Hanke; GmbH & Co KG
Silesia Gerhard Hanke; GmbH & Co KG
Neuss, DE
Other trademarks owned by Silesia Gerhard Hanke; GmbH & Co KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrery H. Greger
Jeffrery H. Greger Hauptman Ham, LLP c/o Franz Intellectual PropertyAdlerstraße 63Düsseldorf,, 40211GERMANYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | [ Colorings, namely, food colors for domestic use ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 003 | Fruit essences, namely, fruit essential oils for flavoring and for use in foods and beverages, orange essences for industrial purposes, namely, orange essential oils for use in foods and beverages, peppermint essences, namely, peppermint essential oils, star-aniseed essence, namely, star-aniseed essential oil, and lemon essence, namely, lemon essential oil for industrial purposes for use in foods and beverages, ethereal essences, namely, ethereal oils for manufacture of alcohol-free and alcoholic drinks, essences, namely, fruit flavored essential oils for refined baking products, flavoring material namely, essential oils for flavoring drinks, baking flavors, namely, fruit essential oils for food flavorings, essential oils made of flower extracts, and ethereal oils, ingredients, namely, fruit essential oils for the production of alcohol-free drinks, ingredients, namely, fruit essential oils for the manufacture of spirits, baking essence, namely, fruit essential oils, flavor materials, namely, essential oils for flavoring beverages, cake flavors, namely, essential oils for cake flavorings | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Meat extracts, soup extracts, sauce extracts, namely, meat flavors, meat, fish and vegetable jellies, fruit pastes, fruit juice concentrates | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Essences, namely, coffee essences, for industrial purposes with the exception of ethereal essences and oils; flavorings, namely, fruit flavorings, except ethereal oils, coffee flavorings, vanilla flavoring, butter flavoring, cheese flavoring, almond flavoring, tea flavoring, lemon flavoring, spice extracts used as flavorings, plant extracts for food seasoning purposes, tea extracts, tomato extracts, cocoa extracts for human consumption, flavorings for the manufacture of spirits, coffee substitutes, spices, sauces, cooking salt; flavorings for baking and sugar confectionery, coffee and mocha pastes | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic fruit extracts for the production of alcohol-free drinks, fruit extracts without alcohol used in the preparation of making beverages, hop extracts for the beer manufacture, unfermented fruit juice and cider extracts used in the preparation of making beverages, non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the production of beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Brandy essences, alcoholic essences and extracts, extracts for spirits, alcoholic punch extracts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Silesia Gerhard Hanke; GmbH & Co KG
- Other trademarks owned by Silesia Gerhard Hanke; GmbH & Co KG
- Other trademarks owned by Silesia Gerhard Hanke; GmbH & Co KG
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named SILAROM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 29, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 2, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |