Drawing for MAJE

USPTO serial 79067261

MAJE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAJE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes, perfumery, eau-de-Cologne, toilet water; scented body milks, body lotions, body beauty gels, body oils, body powders; perfumed shower gels for the body, perfumed soaps; scented bathing salts; scented moisturising creams; personal deodorants; beauty lotions, shampoos and hair creams; make-up preparations, make-up, lipsticks, cosmetic pencils, mascara, make-up foundations, nail varnish for cosmetic purposesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2011DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 26, 2011MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 26, 2011ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 26, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 26, 2011OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 10, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 15, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 14, 2010OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2010OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Dec 29, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 29, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 6, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 1, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 1, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance