USPTO serial 79067331
NISSHINBO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3774932Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 2010
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NISSHINBO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chuo-kuTokyo, JP
JP
JP
JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENICHI SHIBATA
KENICHI SHIBATA APEX JURIS PLLC12733 Lake City Way NE, Suite 101Seattle, WA 98125UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Semiconductor manufacturing machines; photovoltaic module manufacturing machines; metalworking machine tools; punching presses for metalworking; oil hydraulic presses for metalworking; cutting machines for metalworking; bending machines for metalworking; shaping machines for metalworking; perforating machines for metalworking; planing machines for metalworking; threading machines; electric welding machines; forming moulds; press dies for metal forming | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electric property measuring instruments, namely, inspecting apparatus for obtaining photovoltaic conversion characteristics by measuring current-voltage characteristics of photovoltaic module under light irradiation, inspecting apparatus for determining defects in photovoltaic module that uses electroluminescence, inspecting apparatus for testing high voltage isolation and ground continuity test in photovoltaic module, inspecting apparatus for confirming a wire disconnection in a photovoltaic module; semiconductor testing instruments; photovoltaic module testing instruments; photovoltaic cell testing instruments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisshinbo Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisshinbo Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisshinbo Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NISSHINBO INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NISSHINBO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 13, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 16, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |