USPTO serial 79067393
ARGROW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3793239Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 2010
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARGROW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Live plants, namely, woody plants | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Arevo AB
- Other trademarks owned by SweTree Technologies AB
- Other trademarks owned by SweTree Technologies AB
- Other trademarks owned by SweTree Technologies AB
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named ARGROW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 25, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2010 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |