USPTO serial 79067401
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CH
69469 Weinheim, DE
69469 Weinheim, DE
69469 Weinheim, DE
Hexagon Technology Center GmbH
Heerbrugg, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrienne L. White
Adrienne L. White WRB-IP LLPPO BOX 476WADSWORTH, OH 44282UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software to control quality in industrial production | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| May 4, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 16, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |