USPTO serial 79067428
ULTRASIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3832024Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2010
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ULTRASIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah M. Robertson
Sarah M. Robertson Dorsey & Whitney LLP51 West 52nd StreetNew York, NY 10019-6119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer modeling services, namely, computer simulation from computer programs for others regarding the virtual analysis of synthetic plastic components mainly made up of filled and unfilled thermoplastics and of the reaction of synthetic plastic components in certain tests and situations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 21, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |