USPTO serial 79067510
LALA BERLIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LALA BERLIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 15, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |