USPTO serial 79067542
RF2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4051329Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 8, 2011
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with RF2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clifford D. Hyra
Clifford D. Hyra Fresh IP PLC11710 PLAZA AMERICA DR STE 2000RESTON, VA 20190-4743UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for dental plaque control | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OYSTERSHELL N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by OYSTERSHELL N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by OYSTERSHELL N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Nextmune, besloten vennootschap
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named RF2
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 31, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |